Sunday, November 14, 2010

BLog Group #6

This blog is written by Greg Jeffers a very libertarian, investment CEO concerning the American energy crisis and their politics. He claims that this blog is for those who are willing to question everything and if you have a bias to believe everything in the mainstream media that you should not read this blog. He is definitely opinionated and it should be interesting to see peoples' comments with different views than Greg.
http://americanenergycrisis.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Blog Group 5

For our blog, we've chosen this:

AtlasShrugs

AtlasShrugs belongs to Pamela Geller, a deeply opinionated conservative blogger. For the past seven years, Geller has been using her personal blog to, in her words, bring "you the news you will not hear from the mainstream media, providing original reportage, covering little-reported events of great import, and giving an unblinkingly honest examination of global affairs". Her blog has landed her appearances on many of the major news stations, including NBC and CNN. Geller and her blog have also been the topic of a recently published NY Times article and interview.

One can easily note that her opinion, although her written hope is 'honest exmination', is rather biased to her personal conservative views. Her attacks on the Democratic party are ever present. Her views on politics are very clear through her blog. Receiving around 200,000 unique visitors per month, her blog is ever increasing in popularity, but is it directly the same with her impact? Thoughts?

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Blog Group 4

For our blog we chose www.huffingtonpost.com.

It is a mock blog formatted similar to a newspaper and founded by Arianna Huffington, Kenneth Lerer, and Jonah Peretti. The blog offers information and news on politics, entertainment, media, business, the economy and much more. "The Huffington Post" is designed to elicit strong feelings and purposefully meant to embrace the humor in politics, think John Stewart's favorite political blog. The blog receives over a million comments each month and is one of the more famous blogs. It leaves the fear of government up to its reader's minds and focuses more in simply the information, with a little bit of a humorous twist. Enjoy!

Monday, October 18, 2010

Group #3

http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/

For our blog of choice, we decided on “It’s Getting Hot in Here,” a blog known to be “the voice of a growing movement.” As you can infer from the title, the blog is an effort to stop global warming around the world. The posts are written by the youth leaders of the global movement for saving the environment and consist of articles/their opinions on the steps we need to take to save our Earth. Though originally created by a small group of leaders, “It’s Getting Hot in Here” has grown into a global online community, including 300 writers from all over the world. Since the blog is a worldwide movement, can we assume that the posts are more legitimate and unbiased? Or do we still see people using fear of what may happen to the world in the future to promote their own wishes and personal stance on a topic?

Monday, October 11, 2010

Group #2: Fear in the Political Arena

We chose to look at Michelle Malkin's blog, which can be found at http://michellemalkin.com.

Michelle Malkin paints herself to be the normal every day woman. In the ‘about’ section of her blog, she says she is a mother and a wife before anything else, and then adds little fun facts about herself to endear and ingratiate herself with the reader in order to gain their trust. Her blog does a good job of using fear tactics by outlining an event, using biting, humourous commentary and in turn, making the reader feel that politics is corrupt and we need to be weary of it all. It questions issues and everyday events with sly, witty comments to make us question our trust in the government. While at first glance, it looks like she is encouraging the audience to think for themselves, we feel that her underlying message is to get us to trust her because she’s pointing it all out to us by establishing her authority in the matter and voicing concerns. She is really just trying to sway us to her side by undermining the side she is criticizing. What do you think?

Monday, October 4, 2010

Blog Project Group #1

We have determined that we will be using the blog "Pirate's Cove". "Pirate's Cove" is a very conservative blog that exhibits a good amount of bias towards political movements (an example would be calling Rahm Emanuel a "Thugocrat"), military movents, food industry processes, and environmental issues. This blog is a good example of how bias can be used in writing in order to try and persuade or intimidate people into believing what they want them to believe. An example of using fear to persuade can be seen even in the first post on the blog. The author writes about how Rahm Emanuel has no real chance at running in the election but the government may be corrupt enough to swing the election in his favor. This is a good example of fear-mongering because it brings into question if the government is corrupt and really does not care about the general populous.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Fear and the Environment

The blog I have chosen is called Enviroblog and can be found at http://www.enviroblog.org. In a small description about itself, the blog describes its aims as an attempt to encourage a "smart" discussion about the intersection between the environment and public health. More specifically, it mostly discusses possible toxins in our food, clothes, etc. Because it does focus so heavily on toxins, rather than on health in general, however, the blog promotes an atmosphere of fear and danger in which so many of the objects around us may be hazardous. I feel that this makes it an appropriate blog for discussion in our class.

(Now, for the respondents--here are the prompts you can choose to comment on after you visit the blog and read some entries, etc.)

1. Analyze the interface of the featured blog. Focusing on visual elements on the home page, make an argument in your comment on the class blog about what the interface implicitly suggests about the blog's central theme(s), values, or identity (see Writing Analytically on how to make the implicit explicit). Make an inference that could be a topic for class discussion and debate.

2. Look for an argument or disagreement occurring in the comments on a particular post on the featured blog. In your comment on the class blog, analyze the key issues and points of contention in the comments. Based on your observations, develop a theory about what blog’s readers value as a community. Use the following questions to get you started:

What issues or ideas do people seem to agree upon despite the larger disagreement?

Do people on the blog think some comments are rude or inappropriate, and if so why do you think this is?

What rhetorical strategies do commenters use to construct their arguments?

How do commenters reference other comments, and what does that suggest about the nature of interaction within the community?

3. Look for an argument or disagreement occurring in the comments on a particular post on the featured blog. Respond to that argument with a comment of your own on the featured blog. Explain your comment on our class blog and ask our class how they might respond. If you receive a response to your comment on the blog we're analyzing, post an update about how readers responded to your presence or ideas.

4. Look through several posts for any claims about a writer's or several writers' ethos on the featured blog. In your comment, develop an analytical theory about how ethos is working on the blog. Here are some questions to get you started:

How do writer(s) invoke their education, status, experiences, beliefs, or identity? Do these methods ever backfire (do readers ever respond negatively to a writer's identity, education, etc.?)

If there are multiple writers contributing to the blog, do you see any similarities or differences in appeals to ethos across posts? What assumptions can you make about the community based on what appeals to ethos bloggers seem to rely upon most? (For example, is education seen as particularly important? Political beliefs? Gender? Anything else?)

5. Look through several posts for any direct references or appeals to the audience on the featured blog (you might look for the use of the pronoun "you"/"we" or for more subtle techniques, such as posing a question to the audience or inviting the audience to respond). Write a comment on our class blog that states your theory about what those appeals to the audience suggest about who the writer believes the audience is, what they believe the audience values, or what the relationship between the writer/audience seems to be (for example, does the writer ask for the audience's opinion or position herself as an authority, or something else entirely?).

6. Look for one instance or several instances in which an author of a post makes a claim or introduces a new idea on the featured blog. In your comment on the class blog, write an interesting analysis of the rhetorical techniques the author uses to make this argument. You might consider the following questions:

Are any of the ideas particularly controversial, and if so, how does the author attempt to persuade the audience or account for the controversy in advance?

Look for whether readers generally agree or disagree. Formulate a theory about what the trends you notice suggest about the nature of the community, their values, the purpose of the blog, etc.

Does the author cite any evidence or an authority on the subject, and if so, who or what is considered persuasive? Do the readers agree? What kind of knowledge does the community seem to value or disagree upon?

Does the author introduce a new idea by referencing or attempting to improve upon someone else's idea? What might we learn as writer's about how arguments can be built off of or proceed from other arguments? (What's effective and what's not effective?)

7. Read through several posts and comments and formulate a claim about whether or not you think the featured blog actually does anything. In other words, does the blog seem to have any effect on people's knowledge, values, ideas, etc? Provide evidence for your claim in your comment on the class blog.